In a world that is
constantly changing we can no longer be sure the news we hear is the “news” and
not someone’s version of the news.
Certainly the media has fallen a long way away from “just the facts,
Ma’am” to quote Dragnet’s Detective Joe Friday.
It’s not the world of
Walter Cronkite any more. The media has
moved from simply providing the unfettered truth to adding in their own
spin. After all, the American public has
always been a load of fools, hasn’t it?
Come on now, look at the people to your right and left, surely someone
among them, or maybe two, has to be a member of what the infamous Baltimore Sun
editorialist H.L. Mencken called the “booboisie”.
A recent Associated
Press story by Carole Feldman and Emily Swanson suggests that as many as 94
percent of the population do not have a lot of
confidence in the media. Personally, I
think the figures are skewed a bit and the percentage should be somewhat
higher, like 99 percent. But who am I to
say? A part time journalist.
So my thought is for you take a look for yourself. Read the papers or the news on the
Interweb? Probably the Internet is more
honest than a lot of stories in the funny papers, right?
Feldman and Swanson,
in their article, say “Trust
in the news media is being eroded by perceptions of inaccuracy and bias, fueled
in part by Americans' skepticism about what they read on social media.”
In part of this
statement, I think they are dead accurate.
The Americans have little trust in the media. They would like to tie the “why” to social
media, to some degree; but I think the problem isn’t that much of an
outlier. I think the problem with the
media is the media itself and not any of the so-called social media junk. Twitter never wrote a front page story in the
New York Times, or an article in the Times-Dispatch, The Progress-Index, or the
Hopewell News.
I would say an
editorial, but then editorials are supposed to be biased and as such really
don’t rise to the same level of dishonesty or, as we have learned the term,
“misspeaking”. Misspeaking in my
dictionary is a euphemism for lying.
Anyone who steps up to correct a statement they make that turns out to
be false, would love to just say “Sorry, I misspoke.” Who, especially a member of the media or a
politician, would ever be able to keep their status if they simply said the
truth, “Sorry, I lied”?
Sure admitting the
truth is a hard thing to swallow. For a politician, it may hurt for a news
cycle or two, until the booboisie or maybe just a general run of homo
simpleton’s forget that ever happened.
Maybe it did, and maybe it didn’t.
But the public, in general, has a short memory and is very willing to
forgive. Especially if the perpetrator
is your perpetrator. Still, a lie is a lie, right? It’s not someone “misspeaking”. Misspeaking implies a sense of accident. I accidentally said something that was
untrue. Sort of like calling a car crash and accident, which implies no one at
fault.
Perhaps these people
weren’t aware of the fact that they were conjuring up something. Perhaps, and I know this is a stretch, but
maybe it was something from a dream or something that they really, really,
really wanted to happen but didn’t but makes the story better.
In truth the media
likely hasn’t changed very much.
Mencken, who I quoted earlier, wrote when Warren G. Harding was the
president. He had a lot to say about the
American way, and its news vehicles.
For instance, this is how he defined the media of his day “A newspaper
is a device for making the ignorant more ignorant and the crazy crazier.”
Mencken
would have absolutely adored the current political climate. The battles between the candidates running
for office would have provided a person who said, “Democracy is a pathetic belief in the collective wisdom of individual
ignorance” a field day writing about our politics.
Probably none of this applies
to you, dear reader. After all, we are
part of that portion of society that simply sits, points a finger, and giggles,
right? And then again, as the column
writer, I guess that makes me a member of the media and we pretty much covered
how much faith you can put into something the media publishes.
No comments:
Post a Comment