Wednesday, March 16, 2016

Finally proof that homework is bad for you-I knew it!



No doubt I was the bane of several teachers’ existence when I was in any school.  Once I left school, I locked my thoughts of school work and home work in my locker and teetered out the front door—free at last. 
The idea of doing more school work after school let out was foreign in my mind.  Why on earth would anyone do homework?
I would like to dump all that on the teachers, explaining how good they were in covering the topic during class.  They taught to the slowest learner in those days, or at least I thought they did, and covered the salient points of the lesson at least three and often four times in each lesson.  So, in my mind, going home to reinforce an idea or concept that I picked up in the class seemed like a waste of time.  Besides, my fishing pole was always there and the stream behind my house was always stocked with trout.
No doubt my grades in high school suffered due to my philosophy of ignoring home work.  Instead of the A-B student I probably should have been, I was left on the C-pile and was totally unconcerned.  Even when one of my teachers posted our names and “average” on the chalk board as if that might be motivation, I still didn’t care.
In retrospect, a little extra effort there would have helped me a lot.  But I didn’t see it that way, and to me, most of the time, school was an encumbrance.  Yes, I have long since changed my mind about that, but at the time it seemed like the right course of action.
Even today the idea of homework gnaws at me.  Recently Heather Shumaker’s report about homework wrecking our kids appeared in Salon.com, an online journal.  Shumaker avers that no proof exists that substantiates homework as being a benefit for grammar school students.
Duh-huh!
“There is no evidence that any amount of homework improves the academic performance of elementary students,” Shumaker says in the article.
Well I have to agree with that.  In my gut, I feel this is true, but Shumaker goes further by citing several studies.  In the end, she says, “homework has benefits, but that the benefits are age dependent.”
What does “age dependent” mean?  Age dependent means that most of the homework our youngest students get amounts to busy work and a source for grading samples for the teachers.  It is not very effective in the learning process, and, while it may have some bearing in creating habits, the disruption to the family and the creation of the homework police is more detrimental.
Sure this is my summation (see opinion).  And, given my history as described above, I naturally have a bias.  But still, what good does a math worksheet with 10 add, subtract, divide, and multiply problems serve?  Most kids, by the time they have to deal with that, have already had the numbers thing drilled into their heads.  The multiplication tables, out to 12 or so, are immediately retrievable to most kids, I think.  We spend time reinforcing material that does not require reinforcing.  Do we really believe our kids are so dumb?
I realize I am fighting the current of popular belief here, but to me most homework is busy work.  Most homework, especially in elementary school, benefits only the teachers.  Meanwhile, it creates havoc in homes as parents try to deal with their kids’ reluctance to do homework, and often either “help” or in fact do it themselves.
Still, my experience in school as shown earlier, puts me on a different tack.  Yes, I have been subdued.  I realize that failure to comply with this Draconian practice will end up harming my grades.  So, I guess, I will continue to ensure that my kids “do their homework” despite knowing that the benefit of such is far less than what the Education coalition seems to believe.  That’s how we live today in this round hole-round peg, square hole-square peg, and color inside the lines society.

No comments:

Post a Comment